Your repository
Every automation we write lands in your repo. Real code, documented, on a stack any engineer you hire later can pick up.
Right now everyone opens a blank chat and re-explains the business. We turn Claude into something that already knows it — then build the automations that keep running when nobody opens it at all. You own every part of it.
A Claude operating system is a done-for-you setup that turns Claude from a blank chatbot into shared infrastructure for a team: Projects per business area, knowledge files holding your offers and processes, recurring SOPs packaged as Skills, and connected tools. Consolices builds that layer and the automations that run underneath it without prompting, for $5,000 fixed. You keep the repository, the keys and the infrastructure.
Everyone on the team opens the same empty chat box. Each person re-explains the business from scratch, pastes in the same context, and gets an answer shaped by how well they happened to phrase it that morning. Two people ask the same question and get two different answers.
So the value stays trapped with whoever is best at prompting — usually one or two people, usually including you. Everyone else quietly stops bothering, the seats go unused, and the business never accumulates anything. Nothing compounds, because nothing is written down where the tool can reach it.
That is not a model problem and more prompting will not fix it. It is missing infrastructure, and infrastructure is something you build once.
Configuring Claude is worth doing, and it is where nearly every setup stops — which means when nobody opens Claude, nothing happens. We build the layer underneath it too: the work that runs on your infrastructure whether anyone is prompting or not.
Claude, set up so it already knows the business. Every person starts from context instead of a blank page.
One Claude Project per business area — finance, sales, ops, hiring — so nobody works out of a blank chat.
Your offers, your customers, your voice, your processes. Written down once, so the business never gets re-explained.
Your recurring workflows turned into Skills anyone on the team can run the same way, every time.
How your team actually decides — pricing, scoping, hiring, escalation — encoded so the answers stay consistent.
What's live, what's blocked, what was decided and why. Claude reads context instead of asking for it.
Gmail, Drive, Slack, Notion, calendar, your sheets. Wired in so the system reads real data, not pasted data.
The recurring work moved off people entirely. No prompt, no chat window, no one remembering to do it.
Invoices, contracts, statements, IDs read automatically, the structured data pulled out and validated.
A messy spreadsheet in, your rules applied, the result out. Payroll, reconciliation, pricing.
The standard documents produced on demand or on schedule — reports, invoices, client summaries, drafts.
A recurring job that checks state, flags what needs attention, and drafts the follow-up before anyone asks.
Spots the gap — missing document, expiring item, no reply — and writes the nudge for you.
Many logins and a pile of sheets pulled into one number you can trust.
We sit with the people doing the work and write down what actually happens every week — the spreadsheets, the copy-paste, the thing someone does every Friday that nobody documented.
Which work belongs in Claude for a person to run, and which should run on its own without anyone opening a chat window. That split is the whole design.
Projects, knowledge files, Skills and decision frameworks, plus the automations wired into your real tools — on your keys, in your repo, on your infrastructure.
Two live sessions with the team, recordings you keep, docs a non-engineer can follow. Then we watch the first fortnight of real use and fix what people actually trip on.
Everything we build lands on your accounts and stays there. If you never speak to us again, it keeps running.
Every automation we write lands in your repo. Real code, documented, on a stack any engineer you hire later can pick up.
Your Anthropic account, your Google workspace, your integrations. We never sit between you and your own tools.
It runs on your accounts and keeps running if you never speak to us again. Nothing here depends on us staying.
Claude by default because it is the best fit for this work today. Where it matters, the model is a config value, not a rewrite.
A written guide plus a recorded walkthrough, both aimed at whoever runs operations — not at an engineer.
No proprietary layer, no seat fees to us, no platform of ours to leave. You bought a system, not a subscription.
No hourly billing, no scope that grows once you have paid. You know the number and the date up front.
Upkeep as your business changes, plus new workflows as you find them. Month to month — most people start here after the first thing they wish it also did.
Most of these projects don't fail because the automation was wrong. They fail because it landed next to how people already work instead of inside it, nobody was shown why it was better, and within a month everyone quietly went back to the spreadsheet.
So we keep it close to the workflow your team already has, document it for whoever runs operations rather than for an engineer, run two live sessions, and stay through the first two weeks of real use to fix what people actually trip over. Automation thrown at a broken process just breaks it faster — the human part is the part that decides whether any of this was worth doing.
That's usually the problem. The subscription is bought, a couple of people use it well, and everyone else opens a blank chat, re-explains the business, and gets a generic answer. Paying for Claude and having a Claude system are different things — this is the second one.
No, and we'd say so if you asked us to build that. What it removes is the part of people's jobs they'd hand over tomorrow — data entry, reconciliation, chasing documents, rebuilding the same report. The work that needs judgment stays with the people who have it.
That's the failure mode for this kind of project, and it's the reason the build is only half the job. We keep the automation close to how your team already works, document it for non-engineers, run two live sessions, then stay through the first two weeks of real use to fix whatever people trip over. A system nobody adopts isn't a system.
It runs on your accounts and your keys, not ours. Nothing is copied into a platform we own, and we sign a mutual NDA before we look at anything. You can revoke our access the day we hand over and everything keeps working.
Most build the automation and leave. We also build the layer your team talks to, and we treat adoption as part of the deliverable rather than your problem afterwards. And you own the result outright — a lot of shops keep it on their infrastructure so you keep paying.
Your business will change and the system has to change with it. Some clients handle that in-house with the docs; others keep us on a month-to-month retainer for upkeep and new workflows. Either is fine — it's your code either way.
One call, 14 days of work, and your team stops starting from zero. You own the result outright.